Mike Frysinger <vap...@gentoo.org> wrote: > how about putting this implementation into like vmap_nommu() and only > rewriting vmap() to vmap_nommu() when we know it's safe ? such as this > firmware case ?
Well, I'd argue it's _not_ vmap(), so it doesn't really make sense to call it such. Perhaps some better name? Perhaps vcopy()? David _______________________________________________ uClinux-dev mailing list uClinux-dev@uclinux.org http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org To unsubscribe see: http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
