David Howells <dhowe...@redhat.com> wrote: > > how about putting this implementation into like vmap_nommu() and only > > rewriting vmap() to vmap_nommu() when we know it's safe ? such as this > > firmware case ? > > Well, I'd argue it's _not_ vmap(), so it doesn't really make sense to call it > such. Perhaps some better name? Perhaps vcopy()?
How about vcoalesce()? David _______________________________________________ uClinux-dev mailing list uClinux-dev@uclinux.org http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org To unsubscribe see: http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
