Mike Frysinger wrote: > well, they're broken past an execve(). before that, they work fine. i had > an > item to get that fixed, but since i couldnt trace forks in the past, i never > really cared.
strace without -f is still quite useful... but, ah yes, the first execve is hidden on no-MMU. > the issue is just that the trace is out of sync -- it's decoding the call > when > it should be decoding the result, and decoding the result when it should be > decoding the call. again, due to the execve() behavior. Great, that should be an easy one. -- Jamie _______________________________________________ uClinux-dev mailing list uClinux-dev@uclinux.org http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org To unsubscribe see: http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
