On Thursday, April 22, 2010 18:48:26 Jamie Lokier wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > well, they're broken past an execve(). before that, they work fine. i > > had an item to get that fixed, but since i couldnt trace forks in the > > past, i never really cared. > > strace without -f is still quite useful... but, ah yes, the first > execve is hidden on no-MMU. > > > the issue is just that the trace is out of sync -- it's decoding the call > > when it should be decoding the result, and decoding the result when it > > should be decoding the call. again, due to the execve() behavior. > > Great, that should be an easy one.
hrm, i got around to fixing this, but now your patchset doesnt apply to current strace git :( -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ uClinux-dev mailing list uClinux-dev@uclinux.org http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org To unsubscribe see: http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
