On Thursday 24 May 2012 11:05:31 pm Greg Ungerer wrote: > > +#ifdef CONFIG_M5441x > > +#define FEC_NAME "enet-fec" > > So I see that the iMX guys have used a device type prefix here for > the fec name. Does it make any sense to use something like that > for the 5441x as well? So "5441x-fec"? Or will we just not > need to distinguish it this way?
My thinking was that if tomorrow Freescale released a 'm5442x' with 4 enet-fecs then the same quirk would apply, but if it instead had a gigabit enet-fec we'd still need a new quirk anyway; what I want to avoid was given Freescale's fondness of producing varients, either using the wrong name for a chip - 'my m5442x says it has 5441x-fec?' or having a half dozen quirk entries that all selected the same feature. But I dont have strong feelings about this, I just want the ethernet on my twr-mcf54418 to work. _______________________________________________ uClinux-dev mailing list uClinux-dev@uclinux.org http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org To unsubscribe see: http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
