On Thursday 07 June 2012 4:12:02 am Greg Ungerer wrote: > On 06/07/2012 02:59 PM, Steven King wrote: > > On Wednesday 06 June 2012 9:04:09 pm Greg Ungerer wrote: > >> Hi Steven, > >> > >> On 06/06/12 02:48, Steven King wrote: > >>> Add basic support for the m5253demo using the dm9000 ethernet > >>> controller. > >> > >> Is the m5253demo a real board? > >> Or do you mean Freescale's M5253EVB board? > >> > >> If it is really the m5235evb then we should use that name for its files. > >> > >> And generally for a common denominator like the m5253evb I have just > >> used the basic m5253.c as the base board support. A good portion of > >> people use the same basic layout, you end up with a lot of boards > >> that have the same (or similar) peripheral components hooked up in > >> the same way. Those that are really different can have their own board > >> files. > > > > No the m5253demo is a real board: > > http://www.freescale.com/webapp/sps/site/prod_summary.jsp?code=M5253DEMO > > distinct from the m5253evb: > > http://www.freescale.com/webapp/sps/site/prod_summary.jsp?code=M5253EVB > > > > like most of the freescale 'demo' boards, smaller, cheaper, and a > > different peripheral set; I dont think the evb has the wm8731 but does > > has a tft display connector and a keypad, the m5253demo has more ram?... > > really they are quite different. > > All the ones like this I have used in the past they had called "Lite". > But of course they had to use a new and different name this time :-) > > It still seems like this should be a common base at least, so starting > with a m5253.c.
Okay, so now I confused, do you mean the m525x.c? or do you mean still have separate m525x.c and have a m5253.c? _______________________________________________ uClinux-dev mailing list uClinux-dev@uclinux.org http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org To unsubscribe see: http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
