Hi, > While they are physically similar, just as the mpc and the imx are physically > similar, the imx driver has a lot of imx'isms, device tree and OF > dependencies that aren't supported by the m68k/nommu.
Devicetree/OF should be optional. If not, we need to fix it anyhow. So, the question is how much imx'ism there is really in there. > I would expect the changes needed tantamount to having separate > drivers. If that is really true, then two seperate drivers might be the right choice. Yet, I'd like to base this decision on facts and not expectations (which might be wrong). I understand that you worked on the driver for some time now, from a maintanence point of view having only one driver is preferable, though. That works at least for fec.c. > Plus I have no way of testing what impact any changes I made had on > the imx functionality, so I expect I would end up mostly just > annoying the imx developers. I am an imx-developer and I won't be annoyed :) Thanks, Wolfram -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ uClinux-dev mailing list uClinux-dev@uclinux.org http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org To unsubscribe see: http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
