I'm not sure about the new location. I had something different in my mind but lets sort it. I would prefer a single source documentation where the content for the online help (both eclipse and really online help at udig.refractions.net) could be generated. This in mind we need a multi-language system (like OSGeo live does) to support translations.
Single source means also in combination with program code sources (java, xml, etc). 1+ for udig-platform. Within the repository a root doc folder would be the entrance fro documentations, independent from target (user/developer, offline walk-through pdfs/eclipse help for net.refractions.udig.help/online help at http://udig.refractions.net) Is it possible to extract user documentation from confluence wiki for the integrated eclipse help? The wiki has the advantage that potential non programmers haven not to deal with source checkout and obstacles like git fetches/pull's/push's. How likes to help in user docs just need a wiki account, nothing else .. You see, I'm torn between developer friendly single source system and be open for contribution from end-users and non developers without any technical obstacles. What about you? Frank 2012/5/11 Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com>: > With that in mind the correct locations should be: > - plugins/net.refractions.udig.help (for user docs) > - extras/net.refractions.udig.dev (for developers guide; although I think we > could move this to plugins in order to fold it into the maven command line > build) _______________________________________________ User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) http://udig.refractions.net http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
