[...] > PS: there was also another RFC that needed vote, can you please link > it again, so I can get over it? > > Moovida I think this is the pull request you were thinking of. I will sign > into IRC if you would like to review it together.
Nope, it is fine for me if you reviewed it. But please when the docs are finalized let me know, so that we can give those features a decent test. These are core features and in the past such changes lead to a lot of malfunctioning. We need to test them properly with different datatypes. Andrea > > -- > Jody Garnett > > On Monday, 16 July 2012 at 11:53 AM, Levi Putna wrote: > > Hey community, > > I sorry we didn't get to have out IRC catchup last week hoverer I was able > to update the Feature editing workflow RFC with the help of jody and feel > it is ready to for community review/submission. > > http://udig.refractions.net/confluence/display/UDIG/Feature+editing+workflow > > -- > Levi Putna > www.ozblog.com.au > > _______________________________________________ > User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) > http://udig.refractions.net > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel > > > > _______________________________________________ > User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) > http://udig.refractions.net > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel > _______________________________________________ User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) http://udig.refractions.net http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
