Good morning email list, and Andrew / Janet We are indeed setting up to re-license. The RFC is taking shape here: http://udig.refractions.net/confluence/display/UDIG/License+Change
And I would indeed like to confirm that this is done correctly, if you spot anything we have missed please let me know. The goal is to complete this work prior to the Oct 10th meeting. I had a question around the use of EPL (I know it is your recommended default license). The story we are focused on is ability to transfer small blocks of code down into GeoTools when the occasion warrants. - We have a history of pushing, particularly QA and testing code, closer to where the problems occur. - I have also watched teams rapidly prototyped code in uDig (often for a customer / deadline) before transferring the technology to GeoTools in benefit from wider community testing. Q: Is this story possible with EPL, or should we focus on one of the other license options? -- Jody Garnett On Tuesday, 18 September 2012 at 4:51 AM, Andrew Ross wrote: > Also, Jody, unless I have my wires crossed, I believe you were leading > efforts to re-license to EPL prior to making the initial contribution for > uDig. If you would please confirm? Also, perhaps we might help to ensure that > is done correctly? > > I've copied Janet on this email in case you have questions. > > Thank you all, > > -- > Andrew Ross > Director, Ecosystems > Eclipse Foundation (http://eclipse.org) > Twitter: @42aross (http://twitter.com/42aross) > Mobile: 1-613-614-5772
_______________________________________________ User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) http://udig.refractions.net http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
