> I think the best move may be to push and try and find Justin some funding.
That would be great, but for this task I do not have any funding myself. > The Spatialite thing seems a bit bass-ackwards - while I understand having > to put your own customer first, I would like to see Justin's patch accepted > - I hate watching projects getting forked in slow motion :( Actually Justin has issues with sqlite (!= spatialite), I do not think that the spatialite project doesn't accept patches easily. > Were you able to get the details from Justin about spatialite support for > GeoTools? I did point out the new copy of visual studio to Justin - so he > would be in position to build his patches again (for win64 as well). Well, I think he doesn't have time to create the 64 build. And everything else didn't work for me. So right now some things in uDig related to this do not work. Andrea > -- > Jody Garnett > > On Monday, 29 October 2012 at 3:49 PM, andrea antonello wrote: > > Hi Jody, > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 5:53 AM, Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > There has been a couple of interesting developments in the OGC space over > the last couple of weeks. > > 1) First up the OGC has been seriously kicked around by the > standa...@osgeo.org email list, mostly over an area of shared passion (REST > and GeoJson). > > 2) As a result it looks like Carl Reed from the OGC is communicating a bit > more on the standa...@osgeo.org email list, and came up with this a couple > of days ago: > - http://spatialnews.geocomm.com/dailynews/2012/oct/25/news3.html > > What this amounts to (in the words of Frank and Raj) is: > SQLite/Spatialite/Rasterlite databases for vectors, tiles and raster with > rasters formed up into a WMTS style image pyramid. > > Frankly that would rock out, and give us a more useful bundle then a > directory of shape files / rasters to punt around. > > > I am quite aware of that and in touch with the developer since when > the word rasterlite first came to my ears (two years ago). > I will meet the developer (who will be giving a talk about this) in a > couple of weeks in Italy. > > It is also the reason of my concerns about spatialite libraries and 64 > bit windows. I wanted to give a start to the featuremodel (didn't work > out, too many problems with the missing libs, so my momentum faded. > The raster model will be quite different and not sql called, if I got > that correctly. But that is the format I really care about, so we'll > see. > > Anyways, I will keep you posted after I get how things are going to be. > > Cheers, > Andrea > > > I am going to mention it in tonights GeoTools meeting, but this would be a > really strong technical direction of great benefit to the uDig project. I am > afraid I do not have any background details on who is funding (or > participating in this work). > -- > Jody Garnett > > > _______________________________________________ > User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) > http://udig.refractions.net > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel > > _______________________________________________ > User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) > http://udig.refractions.net > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel > > > > _______________________________________________ > User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) > http://udig.refractions.net > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel > _______________________________________________ User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) http://udig.refractions.net http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
