|
Would the following be enough
reasons for CMI chief Col. Noble Mayombo, who is a lawyer,
to excuse himself from the Court martial? No wonder the Court
Martial has hit a snag on day one in the ghost soldiers’ trial. If so, then the CMI
Chief Col Noble Mayombo should excuse himself from
the tribunal trying the soldiers for abuse of office and corruption till the
government of The Porter Commission
observed that UPDF, as an institution, had some weaknesses, which resulted into
some of its officers directly or indirectly participating in the exploitation
of the natural resources of the DRC. Some of the weaknesses pointed out were: (a) Poor
investigation by UPDF commanders and the Chieftaincy of the Military Intelligence (CMI) (b) Lack
of professionalism. (c) Misconduct
by some of the UPDF officers. MINING
The Porter Commission
stated that some individual senior officers and soldiers of the UPDF took
advantage of their postings and participated in the exploitation of resources
in the DRC. The Commission specifically cites Maj. Gen. Kazini,
Col. Mayombo,
Lt. Col. Mugyenyi, Maj. Sonko,
Maj. Kagezi and Lt. David Okumu. It recommends an extremely
careful inquiry into the complaints against UPDF officers implicated in the mining sector. Response:
Government accepts and agrees
with the above recommendation. International Travel Ban
The Porter Commission
did not agree with the recommendation of the Final UN Panel Report to
impose travel bans on the following officers: Lt. General Salim Saleh, Col. Otafiire, Col. Mayombo,
Col. Peter Kerim, Col. Burundi, Sam Engola
and Mr. Piskunov. Incompetence In
Investigations
The Porter Commission
observed that from the evidence of Maj. General Kazini,
there is incompetence or total lack of inquiry and failure to deal effectively
with breaches of discipline at senior levels. It further stated that from the evidence of Col. Mayombo, the Commission
concluded that, Military Intelligence’s investigations are not good
enough. Col. Mayombo admitted that some
cases are not reported to Headquarters by field officers. The Porter Commission Report
recommended a serious consideration of those holding senior posts in UPDF. Response:
(a) While
Government notes the above recommendation it wishes to point out that
shortcomings of the few officers does not justify serious considerations of
competence of all the other UPDF officers holding senior posts. (b) Government
also reiterates that the ongoing Defence Review Programme
will address such weaknesses, where they exist.
The Porter Commission
stated that the Commission
heard evidence from the “ The Commission found
the evidence not reliable, as the documents were questionable. Response:
Government
notes the Commission’s exoneration of the individuals above. The government of ---
|
<<image001.gif>>

