U.S. Struggles to Address Situation in Sudan

    
  Email This Page 

Print This Page 

Visit The Publisher's Site 
  
   
 
 
allAfrica.com 

June 16, 2004 
Posted to the web June 16, 2004 

Alec Johnson


With an estimated 30,000 killed, and two million displaced by Arab militias in Darfur, 
western Sudan, the U.S. has vowed to increase pressure on the Khartoum government to 
stop human rights atrocities in the region, despite any negative effects this may have 
on the recent peace agreement between the government and the southern SPLM/A rebels 
let by John Garang.

The May 26th signing of three key protocols on power-sharing and oil revenue 
distribution by the government of Sudan and the SPLM/A has been hailed as a solid 
opportunity to end the 21 year civil-war that has devastated the country and left over 
two million Sudanese dead. But as fighting between the north and the south has died 
down, conflict has erupted in the west.

  
Many believe the Khartoum government is taking advantage of the United States' desire 
to see an end to the civil war as a chance to crush the armed opposition in Darfur, 
which has emerged as a greater threat than the SPLM/A posed. A solution the 
north-south conflict has proved extremely elusive in the past, and, if achieved, would 
provide the Bush administration with an important success story in Africa.

At a U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations Briefing on Tuesday entitled "Sudan: 
Peace But at What Price", Senator Lamar Alexander (R-TN) sought to dispell this 
notion. "Some of our friends are reportedly concerned that confronting Khartoum too 
directly about atrocities in Darfur will jeopardize any prospect for lasting peace in 
southern Sudan," he said. "They may be right. But if hundreds of thousands of lives 
are the price of peace in southern Sudan, the price is too high."

At the same briefing, Acting Assistant Secretary for African Affairs Charles Snyder 
said the US government "cannot and will not lessen pressure on the Government of Sudan 
and allow what is happening in Darfur to continue in order to achieve a north-south 
peace accord." He added that the US government is exploring actions that it could 
take, including the freezing of Sudanese assets in the US and the prohibiting of the 
issuance of visas to those responsible for the atrocities in Darfur.

With the rainy season approaching in Sudan, USAID has estimated that as many as 
350,000 Sudanese could die if aid agencies don't act immediately. Flooding will impede 
the transportation of vital medicines and food aid, delivery of which has already 
proved difficult because of strict customs procedures. Humanitarian access to the west 
of the country has improved but is still vastly insufficient, as many are forced to 
wait extended periods of time for entry visas.

In his opening statement at the hearing, Senator Joseph Biden (D-DE) called on the 
administration to request a budget supplemental to "provide the funds necessary to 
address the humanitarian crisis." After a pledge by USAID Administrator Andrew Natsios 
of $188.5 million at a donor's conference on June 3, the planned US contribution to 
the region totals $300 million.

Relevant Links 
 
East Africa 
North Africa 
Civil War and Communal Conflict 
Sudan 
United States, Canada and Africa 
Humanitarian Abuses and Civilians 
Aid 
 
 
 
Yet even if the Sudanese government lifted all impediments to humanitarian access, 
allowing the millions of dollars of pledged-aid to reach the needy populations, there 
would still exist the problem of security on the ground. An influx of food and 
medicine to Darfur without a proportional increase in security would only give 
government-backed 'jinjaweed' militias additional motivation to raid and pilfer more 
frequently, non-governmental organizations argue.

In his address to the Senate hearing, John Prendergast of the International Crisis 
Group said "the current approach to preventing famine and further atrocities simply 
will not succeed." He suggests that Congress and the Bush administration work both 
through the UN and unilaterally to increase aid to Darfur, while also putting an end 
to the atrocities there and pushing for a sustainable peace.



--------------------------------------------
This service is hosted on the Infocom network
http://www.infocom.co.ug

Reply via email to