Compatriots, I was only telling my mates how much I love all of us democratic humans. My gratitude ( in advance, moreover) for extending to me a helping hand so even I can understand the rational behind those pests called DEMOCRACY, FREEDOM, LIBERTY, ACCOUNTABILITY & RESPONSIBILITY, PEACE, LOVE and above all, JUSTICE.
Once again deficit as transpired. Subsequent controversy and obscurity amids Brigadier Banya surrender / capture or whatever, clearly demystifies "BLOOD DENSITY DEMOCRACY" (rd.demagogue mobb democracy / anarchy).
In essence, the Brigadier Banya case is no sensation. What is sensational is the way folk who have always hollered "DEMOCRACY and JUSTICE" suddently make a about-turn. I personally think it is wrong for people to demand pardon / impunity etc., even before the man is tried in a democratic and fair court of justice.
If he should be pardoned or acquited, should that not be after his has been tried in court?!?!?
Our concern should on the contrary, be TO ENSURE THAT THE GUY IS TRIED IN A FREE AND FAIR DEMOCRATIC COURT OF JUSTICE. I both realise and consider of course, that our dilema may be just that: THE LEGAL INSTITUION, the jurdiciary may not be well structured enough to guarantee a fair trial in cases of this magnitude.
My fear is that they may be easily dysfunctional.
I keeping thinking if this kind of schenario would have surfaced HAD THE LRA GENUINELY COMMITED TO AND COMPLIED WITH the peace resolution efforts.
Like I was saying, would any of you be kind enough to extend a helping hand to account for those rogue terms ( DEMOCRACY, FREEDOM, LIBERTY, ACCOUNTABILITY & RESPONSIBILITY, PEACE, LOVE and above all, JUSTICE)??
OK., we are aware of course, that there are many different kinds and types of democracies.I am particularly intrested in emphasis amids the obsecure PRE-REQUISITES for their accomplishment / success.
Like the forces which maintain our world on track, I believe in Devine democratic rules (institutions). Yet, this subsequnt week, I got a whole hell of scourges for not understanding the realm and rational of contemporary Ugandan fashion: "BLOOD DENSITY JUSTICE". A best mate in �rebro once introduced the phenomenon to me. He said, "in a true democracy, at the moment of truth, BLOOD IS THICKER THAN WATER."
To date, his notion of democracy is still opegue to me. I keep asking myself whether this "blood is thicker than water" stuff is at it's micro or macro exposure. I keep wishing that it is indeed, at macro stance. At least I hope so, for democracy's sake!
A dilema we are paying for now is that those rules have always been put out of play.Contemporary Ugandan generations are not democracy in the marrows.
If ever we should accomplish a genuine state of democracy; a generation Uganda in whom democracy is obvious or if ever we should ensure (safeguard our democracy) that no single individual or entity shall ever take our country for selfish ride, then we must play along Devine rules of the game. Otherwise, this kind of situation will always recurr.
Another dilema is that no generation wants to be the first in this kind of circumstances. Had these rules already been customary and obvious norms, there would not be any controversy about a clear cut case as this. Human development should be our biggest challange for the coming decades.
Which generation will sacrifice to be the gong-gong generation for "democracy in the marrow " Ugandan?
Veckans Pollenprognos hittar du nu p� MSN V�der. Klicka h�r -------------------------------------------- This service is hosted on the Infocom network http://www.infocom.co.ug
