Ndugu Issa Shivji:
 
You have spoken very well. Right now the goal ,  yours and mine, is to educate the masses about the benefit of an East africa federation
 
Matek

"Bernard Z. Mhando" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
TOWARDS A FEDERATION OF THE GREAT LAKES REGION

Issa Shivji

Issa Shivji examines the possibility of Federation of the Great Lakes  Region consisting of Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, Rwanda, Burundi and the  DRC. Such a federation, he states, would boost a genuine Pan-Africanism  and contribute towards peace in the region.


The East African Federation is again on the horizon. The timetable is  out. The Federation that was much talked about over forty years ago by  the nationalist leaders may just come to fruition but under very  different conditions. All the peoples of East Africa must debate these  new conditions. This time around we should not leave it simply to the  states and politicians to unite us. Only if we unite as a people, can  we ensure a sustained unity. And as a people we have to widen our  horizons to take into account new conditions and possibilities.

There are two new conditions that I would like to raise. First, the   original four countries - Kenya, Uganda, Tanganyika and Zanzibar -  which were supposed to be part of the Federation in the early 1960s  have contracted to three as Tanganyika and Zanzibar are now Tanzania.  As we know, the Union question itself has been a subject of much  discussion among us. Do we need to resolve this issue as we enter the  Federation?

Secondly, the number of potential members of the Federation has  expanded to five. Rwanda and Burundi have not only shown interest but  want very much to be part of the process right from the beginning. This  is a welcome sign. But we have to go beyond.

We have to think in terms of a Federation of Great Lakes Region  (FGLR). The Federation of Great Lakes Region would include the  Democratic Republic of Congo. There are many very good reasons why we  should think in terms of a greater federation.

The DRC shares longest borders with at least four Ea st African  countries, Tanzania, Uganda, Rwanda and Burundi. It is the richest  country in Africa holding the world's biggest deposits of copper,  cobalt and cadmium. DRC has seen no peace as its riches are coveted by  imperial powers. Even neighbouring countries like Uganda and Rwanda did  not spare DRC. The wars in DRC invariably spill over to the  neighbouring East African countries whether this is in the form of  hundreds of thousands of refugees as in Tanzania or armed conflicts as  in Uganda, Burundi and Rwanda.

Both peace and prosperity in this part of the world depend  strategically on peace, stability and prosperity in the DRC. It is not  possible to secure peace without the DRC being part of a larger  political entity.

Within the FGLR, Tanzania can play a stabilizing role while at the  same time helping to curb what looks like territorial ambitions on the  part of Rwanda. The Great Lakes Region is becoming one of the most  militarized zones in Africa as Western powers (including,  unfortunately, South Africa) continue to pump arms into the region.  Within a larger political grouping, it is perhaps easier and more  feasible to control civil wars which have been transformed into border  wars between countries.

Within the FGLR, given different sizes and resources of the countries  concerned, co-operation is likely to be complementary rather than  competitive. First, no single country within FGLR has the potential of  becoming a political or economic hegemon, unlike, for example, if DRC  were to be sucked into the Southern African orbit. Secondly, culturally  we can build on the common linguistic foundation of Swahili as the  language is widely spoken in the Great Lakes Region. Thirdly, the  uneven industrial development among the potential members of FGLR is  not as intense as to pose a threat to a mutually advantageous  development. Fourthly, the great lakes, the railways and the harbours  on the Eastern seaboard provide an excellent web of transport both  within the region and with the outside world. Finally, at this stage, a  larger federation which includes DRC is to the mutual advantage of both  the East African countries, as traditionally categorized, and the DRC.

As a matter of fact, such a project resulting in peace in this region  of Africa would dramatically boost genuine Pan-Africanism and bring the  dream of African Unity closer.

Finally, the FGLR would be formidable enough to protect itself from  the ravages of imperial exploitation while at the same time pausing no  expansionist or military threat to its neighbours.

Conversely, an East African Federation as presently conceived with  Rwanda-Burundi in and DRC out, has the potential of dragging in the  relatively peaceful East Af rican countries into DRC/Rwanda/Burundi  conflicts, in the process weakening both East Africa and DRC. Truly,  history has not left us much choice: we either federate and create  hopes for peace and prosperity or consume ourselves in incessant  fratricidal wars.

The vision of FGLR is feasible. Will our leaders rise to the occasion?

* (c) Issa Shivji. Shivji is Professor of Law at the University of Dar  es Salaam, Tanzania.



Mwananchi is an open forum that discusses/updates you on the latest news in Africa. It is a group that is made up of 900 members worldwide. To join it simply go to http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/mwananchi





Yahoo! Groups Links


Yahoo! Mail
Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour
_______________________________________________
Ugandanet mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet
% UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

Reply via email to