EM,
I have been reading this exciting events unfolding. It is the end for
Harper. I don't think there is anymore turning back. Now, this is democracy
in fair play. Very interesting indeed, but soon we will be having a new
government. It caught Harper off-guard and instantlt humbled him like a
bulldog squeezed by the b..ls.
 

I am Peter-Rhaina Gwokto and I approve this message. 

  _____  

Remember: "Even a small dog can piss on a tall building" Jim Hightower
http://lakitgum.wordpress.com <http://lakitgum.wordpress.com/> 


 

  _____  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Mulindwa Edward
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 5:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected]
Subject: [Ugnet] THE HUMBLING OF A PRIME MINISTER



The humbling of a Prime Minister

LAWRENCE MARTIN 

>From Monday's Globe and Mail

December 1, 2008 at 12:11 AM EST

Elizabeth May tells a story from the televised election debates. The rules
stipulated that leaders were allowed to bring in blank paper for
note-taking. “I'm seated next to Stephen Harper,” the Green Party Leader
recalls, swearing she isn't imagining things, “and I look down on his little
table. His paper isn't blank. He's got all these notes, already prepared. It
was like to hell with the rules. I do what I want.” 

That was then. This is now.

Now, a domineering Prime Minister known for running a minority like he has
won a landslide is on bended knee, petitioning for survival. In a matter of
days Mr. Harper has recanted on his plan to withdraw public funding for
political parties, has disavowed his intent to eliminate the right of public
servants to strike, has moved up the timing of his budget and moved back the
timing of a confidence vote.

The sight of him semi-prostrate before the likes of Stéphane Dion and Jack
Layton is not something many would have believed. He hasn't done the full
revocation yet. He hasn't come forward with a plan for major stimulus in the
budget, as opposition parties demand. That could come later this week. But
whatever the outcome of the current crisis, one thing is clear: This is a
Prime Minister who is getting his comeuppance. You live by the sword, you
die by the sword. He isn't dead, but he is mightily humbled. History won't
forget these days.Many of us thought he might be changing his ways. I'd
written countless columns about his autocratic tactics, but thought that
with his election win in October we were seeing a new Stephen Harper, that
he was more relaxed and secure. He made some impressive personnel changes
and seemed to be displaying a little more bipartisanship. But his opting to
play power-monger politics in the midst of a global economic crisis last
week showed there was little change. It confirmed the worst suspicions.

Having dug himself into this chasm, the Prime Minister is now making the
right moves – especially if he signals more economic stimulus – in trying to
dig himself out. He had little choice, given the scathing media reaction, to
eat crow on his economic update. With his pullback, he now leaves the
opposition parties with less ammunition. He makes it look like they are the
ones who, with their continued coalition-plotting, are engaged in a power
grab.

The opposition will argue that the PM's intent was clear, that he doesn't
deserve a second chance, that he cannot be trusted – and that, indeed, he
did have a hidden agenda, it being total political control via his party
non-funding plan. Mr. Harper did not reveal the funding reform plan or some
of the other measures in his election campaign or in his Throne Speech. They
were inserted at the last minute in the update. He once denounced Joe Clark
for losing his 1979 minority on the basis of a gasoline tax that the Tory
leader had not campaigned on. “You can be principled without being stupid,”
Mr. Harper said of Mr. Clark. But last week Mr. Harper proceeded to do a
similar thing.

The PM also told everyone he was familiar with the mistakes leaders made in
the Great Depression of the 1930s – belt-tightening instead of stimulus.
Mysteriously he didn't heed it, at least not in his economic statement.

If defeated on a non-confidence motion, he will hope the Governor-General
allows him to fight an election. He might wish before seeing her to retract
his attempt to pressure her. He said Friday that Mr. Dion “does not have the
right to take power without an election.” This is blatantly wrong. The
Opposition leader does, in fact, have the constitutional right in a minority
government and the Governor-General has the authority to confer it.

Up until now, the Prime Minister has been able to get away with his
strong-arm tactics, his disavowing of his own election law being another
recent example. But the economic update did much to expose the essence of
him. My suspicion is that we don't know the half of what went on in his
first term and that if there were more journalistic inquiry the extent of
his attempts to put a stranglehold on the system would be found to be
startling.

Last week, a bureaucrat with close ties to the PMO, said Mr. Harper has told
colleagues, “When I'm hiring someone, I want to see fear in their eyes.” It
may be an apocryphal story, but like Ms. May's, it seems to fit the mould.
In any case, the fear isn't in the eyes of others now. It's in his own.

 The Mulindwas Communication Group
"With Yoweri Museveni, Uganda is in anarchy"
            Groupe de communication Mulindwas 
"avec Yoweri Museveni, l'Ouganda est dans l'anarchie"
_______________________________________________
Ugandanet mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet
% UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/


The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------

Reply via email to