Newsweek
<http://ndn.newsweek.com/site/images/printpage_newsweek_banner.gif> 

Sponsored By
The World's Worst Banker?

With so many candidates, it's difficult to choose.

Daniel Gross
Newsweek Web Exclusive
Dec 2, 2008 | Updated: 9:29  a.m. ET Dec 2, 2008

In the past couple of years, the entire global lending industry has covered
itself in shame. Virtually every banker was suckered by the credit and
housing bubble. But who made the sorriest choices? Who forced shareholders
and the public to bear the highest financial cost? Who, in short, is the
Worst Banker in the World?

There's no dearth of candidates. Richard Fuld of Lehman Bros. and James
Cayne of Bear Stearns presided over the remarkably disruptive failures of
their respective firms. But Bear and Lehman weren't banks, properly
speaking: They were hedge funds lashed to investment banks. And their
demises didn't require much of a public bailout. The failures of AIG, Fannie
Mae, and Freddie Mac necessitated massive bailouts, but they weren't exactly
banks, either. Iceland's bankers have effectively brought their entire
country to ruin. But since Iceland's population is a mere 300,000, they're
off the hook. In an interview Monday, Nobel laureate Paul Krugman nominated
the gang that ran Citigroup into the ground. But Citi was so big it took
three CEOs-Sandy Weill, Chuck Prince, and Vikram Pandit-to bring it to the
brink of disaster.

No, my nominee is someone whose name may not be familiar to American
audiences. He's Fred Goodwin, who until October served as CEO of the Royal
Bank of Scotland. Goodwin (here's the Wikipedia entry
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Goodwin>  about him) took the helm of RBS
in 2000 and proceeded to turn it into an international powerhouse. Known as
"Fred the Shred" for his willingness to cut costs-and jobs-he emerged as
Britain's leading banker. He was even knighted in 2004
<http://news.scotsman.com/birthdayhonours/Its-honours-all-round-on.2536882.j
p>  for services to banking. But the bank, which this summer was Britain's
largest, is now neither Royal nor Scottish nor much of a bank. RBS's slogan
is "Make it happen." A review of the record shows that Goodwin indeed made
it happen. He aced every requirement for a hubristic CEO.

Let's review the record.

Carrying off mergers and acquisitions and calling them growth? Yes. After
buying British bank Natwest for about 26.4 billion pounds in 2000, Goodwin
used RBS's cash and high-flying stock as a currency for more deals. Among
the biggest was the $10.3 billion purchase of Charter One Financial, a
Cleveland-based bank, in 2004, thus expanding the bank's footprint in the
Rust Belt.

Ill-advised, history-making, massive merger precisely at the top? Yep. In
November 2007, RBS and its partners, Fortis and Banco Santander, completed
their acquisition of Dutch bank ABN Amro. As proud adviser Merrill Lynch
noted
<http://gmi.ml.com/editorial/07nov_abnamro.asp?gmi=ILC-abnAmromlcom&WT.ac=US
_GMI_ABNAMRO_200711> , the $101 billion deal was "the world's largest bank
takeover and one of the most complex M&A transactions ever." And it closed
almost precisely when the air started to come out of the global lending
bubble.

Massive commitment of capital to investment banking, trading in funky
securities, and poor credit controls? Yes, yes, and yes. As this excellent
Bloomberg postmortem notes, by June 2008, RBS had become Europe's largest
lender. "Under Goodwin's tutelage, RBS also became Europe's biggest backer
of leveraged buyouts," reporter Simon Clark notes. Goodwin also jacked up
the bank's trading, "boosting derivatives assets 44 percent to 483 billion
pounds in the first half of 2008," which was greater than the bank's net
deposits. "Meanwhile, its reserves of Tier 1 capital, a measure of financial
strength and the vital reserve set aside to cover losses, was the lowest
among its U.K. rivals at the start of 2008." In other words, Goodwin
designed a house that would teeter when the slightest ill wind began to
blow.

Building an expensive, self-indulgent new headquarters building just in time
for the collapse? Right-o. In 2006, RBS started construction on a huge
<http://www.stamfordadvocate.com/localnews/ci_11098904> new headquarters in
Stamford, Conn., which would house its expanding U.S. investment banking and
trading operations. The centerpiece of the 12-story, $500 million
<http://www.topix.com/content/trb/2008/04/royal-bank-of-scotland-building-ri
ses-in-stamford>  building is one of the largest trading floors in the
world. It should be ready for occupancy (or, given recent job cuts, partial
occupancy) next year.

Telling shareholders you don't need more capital, and then raising it-and
then having that capital lose value rapidly? Yep. In February 2008, Goodwin
said, "There are no plans for any inorganic capital raisings or anything of
the sort." But in June, RBS sold
<http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=apPiltVmVsGM&refer=home
>  12.3 billion pounds (about $20 billion) in shares at 200 pence per share,
which was a significant discount to the then-market price. By October, as
this chart shows <http://uk.finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=RBS.L&t=6m> , the stock
was slumping.

And finally: Dump problems on fellow citizens by messing things up so badly
the bank has to be nationalized? Bingo. With the stock continuing to slip,
RBS staged another rights offering, giving brutalized shareholders an
opportunity to add to their sharply discounted holdings at a sharp
discount-in this case at 65.5 pence per share. But shareholders passed, and
the government last Friday had to step in as buyer of last resort, ponying
up 20 billion pounds and assuming an ownership stake of about 60 percent.
(The Guardian tells
<http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/nov/28/royalbankofscotlandgroup-ban
king>  the grim tale.)

The result? RBS's stock (here's a
<http://uk.finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=RBS.L&t=2y> two-year chart) has lost 91
percent of its value since March 2007 and retains value thanks only to
massive government intervention. A job well-done, Sir Fred!

URL: http://www.newsweek.com/id/171688
C 2008 
 

I am Peter-Rhaina Gwokto and I approve this message. 

  _____  

Remember: "Even a small dog can piss on a tall building" Jim Hightower
http://lakitgum.wordpress.com <http://lakitgum.wordpress.com/> 


 

<<printpage_newsweek_banner.gif>>

<<Blank Bkgrd.gif>>

_______________________________________________
Ugandanet mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet
% UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/


The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------

Reply via email to