U.S.: Iran’s Role in Arms Treaty Conference ‘Undermines the Credibility of
the United Nations’


By Patrick Goodenough <http://cnsnews.com/source/patrick-goodenough> 

July 16, 2012

 

 <http://cnsnews.com/image/donald-mahley> Description: Donald Mahley

Donald Mahley serves as the U.S. special negotiator for nonproliferation.
This file picture shows him addressing a Biological Weapons Convention
review conference in Geneva in 2001. (AP Photo/Donald Stampfli)

(CNSNews.com) – Nine days after Iran was elected to a body
<http://cnsnews.com/news/article/news/article/iran-oversee-un-arms-treaty-co
nference-choosing-bernie-madoff-police-fraud>  overseeing a United Nations
conference negotiating a global arms trade treaty, the Obama administration
responded on Thursday, reprimanding members of the world body for elevating
a weapons proliferating regime to the position.

The response came after several days of criticism
<http://cnsnews.com/news/article/news/article/rogue-regimes-un-leadership-po
sts-why-should-us-continue-no-strings-attached-funding>  over the latest
leadership post to be handed to a government that habitually defies
international norms. Iran was selected on July 3 as one of 14
vice-presidents of a month-long U.N. conference in New York, aimed at
hammering out a global conventional arms trade treaty.

Breaking its silence on the matter, the administration on Thursday used a
speech to the conference to criticize the move, and the U.S. Mission to the
U.N. followed up with a separate statement.

“Iran’s longstanding record of weapons proliferation, illicit nuclear
activities, and gross human rights abuses properly disqualifies it from
serving in any such position in the United Nations,” U.S. envoy Donald
Mahley told the gathering.

“At a time when Iran is violating U.N. Security Council obligations,
including by helping rearm Hezbollah in Lebanon and providing weapons to the
Assad regime to use to slaughter its own people, this selection makes a
mockery of this conference’s underlying purposes and undermines the
credibility of the United Nations,” he added.

Mahley, who serves as special negotiator for nonproliferation, said Iran was
also misrepresenting its role at the meeting, “implying it secured its
election on the basis of their record on international peace and security.
The United States rejects the legitimacy of Iran’s claimed capacity to play
a credible role in this conference.”

As reported earlier, Iranian media played up the appointment, with Tehran
Times stating that Iran “is assisting the president of the Arms Trade Treaty
Conference in the general conduct of the business of the conference” while
the Iranian Students’ News Agency said that Iran was “elected as the deputy”
of the conference.

Shortly after Mahley delivered his speech, U.S. Mission spokesman Mark
Kornblau issued a statement
<http://usun.state.gov/briefing/statements/194947.htm>  on the issue,
calling Iran’s role “outrageous.”

“Iran was selected to run on a closed slate of candidates put forward by the
Asia group, of which the United States is not a member,” he said. (Three
slots were earmarked for Asia, and Asia put forward three countries – Iran,
South Korea and Japan.)

“The U.S. has argued repeatedly and forcefully that countries like Iran that
are under Security Council sanctions for weapons proliferation or massive
human-rights abuses should be barred from any formal or ceremonial positions
in U.N. bodies,” Kornblau continued. “It is incumbent upon regional groups
to enforce this common-sense principle. We regret that on this occasion, the
Asia group did not do so.”

Kornblau also said that the U.S. had in the past “successfully fought to
deny Iran decision-making roles in various U.N. bodies,” citing as examples
the effort in the spring of 2010 to thwart a Iranian bid for a seat on the
U.N. Human Rights Council
<http://cnsnews.com/news/article/news/article/iran-drops-bid-human-rights-co
uncil-seat-eyes-women-s-rights-body-instead>  (HRC) and later that year to
deny Iran a place
<http://cnsnews.com/news/article/news/article/late-entry-foils-iran-s-bid-se
at-board-new-un-women-s-agency>  on the executive board of the new agency
promoting the equality of women, U.N. Women.

“We strongly believe that the U.N. must reform the outdated procedures and
elections practices that allow pariah states to participate in completely
inappropriate ways in parts of the U.N. system,” he added.

Iran’s departure from the HRC election in 2010 came at a price: The Asia
group, under pressure to reverse the nomination, secured Iran’s agreement to
pull out, in exchange for support from its Asian partners for a seat on
another U.N. rights body, the Commission on the Status of Women (CSW).

Just days later, Iran duly got a seat on the CSW, despite an appeal by
hundreds of Iranian women’s rights activists, who told the U.N. Tehran would
use its position “to curtail progress and the advancement of women.”

Neither the U.S. nor any other country objected or called for a recorded
vote, so Iran was
<http://cnsnews.com/news/article/news/article/silence-us-and-its-allies-allo
wed-iran-get-seat-un-women-s-rights-body> “elected” to the position “by
acclamation.”

The custom at the U.N. of regional groups putting forward closed slates –
submitting the same number of countries as there are seats available for
that group – has long been condemned by critics who say the absence of
competition makes a mockery of the “election” process. Closed slates have
enabled countries like Cuba, Libya and Saudi Arabia to get seats on the HRC
notwithstanding human rights records at home that draw widespread criticism.

In the most recent such step, the Africa group last week put forward a clean
slate of five candidates for five seats on the HRC earmarked for African
countries, ahead of elections later this year. One of the five is Sudan –
despite the fact that President Omar al-Bashir has been indicted by the
International Criminal Court for war crimes, crimes against humanity and
genocide, arising from the conflict in Darfur.

Unless an additional African country is persuaded to submit a candidacy and
make the “election” an actual contest, Bashir’s regime is all but assured of
a seat on the U.N.’s top human rights body.

 

 

           Thé Mulindwas Communication Group
"With Yoweri Museveni and Dr. Kiiza Besigye Uganda is in anarchy"
           Kuungana Mulindwa Mawasiliano Kikundi
"Pamoja na Yoweri Museveni na Dk. Kiiza Besigye Uganda ni katika machafuko"

 

<<image001.jpg>>

_______________________________________________
Ugandanet mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet

UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------

Reply via email to