Breastfeeding and Sex: Is Latching On a Turn-Off?

By JAMES BRALY <http://parenting.blogs.nytimes.com/author/james-braly/> 

Extended breastfeeding, the current scientific thinking goes, offers
significant health benefits for the child, and probably for the mother. But
what about for the father? Is what’s good for the gosling and the goose,
also good for the gander? And why does it matter?

I know, most women think their breasts are theirs. I’ve been hearing this
since I was a toddler being cautioned, “Don’t touch!” But most guys just
want to touch. Most girls, thank God, eventually make some guys lucky. One
thing leads to another. And here we are, discussing the consequences of a
touch too much: children. So to everyone chanting “My Body! My Choice!” I
say, “Your Body! Our Nookie!” We are in this together, women and children,
men — and breasts.

So any conclusions about extended breast-feeding must consider the impact on
the whole family. And I would argue, based both on anecdotal evidence and
personal experience, that the impact on the man in the family, eventually,
is negative. A recent (if highly dubious) study of Brooklyn families linked
helicopter mothering with philandering.
<http://parenting.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/04/does-helicopter-parenting-dri
ve-dads-to-cheat/>  The argument: a mother who hovers over her little prince
or princess too long leaves the former king of the castle feeling
increasingly powerless, and likelier to seek a queen on the side.

Other men — me, for example — might be driven to engage in something even
worse: sexless fidelity. Mine crystallized in Central Park one evening,
while watching my wife sit under a tree with my older son, a
five-and-a-half-year-old young man with a full set of teeth and chores,
stretched out to roughly the size of a foal, suckling. By the time they
strolled back to me and my already-nursed toddler son on the picnic blanket,
I had lost my appetite — and not just for the smoked salmon. There are some
things in life most men cannot share with first-graders, and two of them
used to be called breasts. Now, my first grader called them boobalies, and
history is written by the victors.

The complicating factor for me was, I loved my children. And the most
challenging part of love, for me, is empathy. Seeing my wife’s breasts
through my boys’ eyes…given the choice, I knew I’d do what they were doing.
Before they came along, I did. Which at that heartbreaking moment made it
impossible not to support their mother’s choice to breastfeed — as their
father. As their mother’s husband, however, I was dry-heaving — and bile is
not an aphrodisiac.

Lest you think sex is a private matter, I would argue that the decline of a
couple’s sex life can have significant social consequences. A man’s loss of
appetite for his companion can undermine his partnership, his family and
ultimately the society of families. Even the environment takes a hit:
suddenly, the divorcing couple needs a second house, an extra car, another
set of Ziploc lunch bags off-gassing plastic fumes into the ozone, and on
and on.

To those of you who believe breast-feeding a child who can blow out all five
of his birthday candles is a totally natural behavior to be regulated only
by the mother without considering the effects on the father, I would ask,
should sex, a totally natural behavior, be regulated only by the father
without considering the effects on the mother? For what man in a committed
relationship has not considered having sex with someone other than his
breast-feeding partner? Someone he knows or — if he’s a sports star or a
politician — a waitress at the diner or a videographer who tells him he’s
hot. Considering such liaisons is biology for most men. Considering
breast-feeding a toddler may be biology for increasing numbers of women.

But a family man who wants to keep his family knows to say no. The positive
effects of a sexual encounter on an otherwise monogamous man are outweighed
by the negative effects on his companion, and consequently on them.
Similarly, the positive effects of extended breast-feeding should be
considered in light of the negative effects on the marriage. In other words,
sex and its consequences are a family affair.

So to all nursing moms, except perhaps those who used a lab technician, I
say that the foundation of the parent-child bond is the parent-parent bond.
Unlike the baby chicken or the fertilized egg conundrum, partnership
precedes parenthood. That’s how you got into this position to begin with: by
attracting a man who liked what he saw, and wanted to see more of what even
the scientists researching extended breast-feeding call mammaries, not
Mommaries.

 

 

           Thé Mulindwas Communication Group
"With Yoweri Museveni and Dr. Kiiza Besigye Uganda is in anarchy"
           Kuungana Mulindwa Mawasiliano Kikundi
"Pamoja na Yoweri Museveni na Dk. Kiiza Besigye Uganda ni katika machafuko"

 

_______________________________________________
Ugandanet mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet

UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------

Reply via email to