How AG Barr Outsmarted Mueller and His ‘Pitbull’ Weissmann and Shut Down the
Russia Hoax


 by Joe Hoft 

May 28, 2019  



AG Barr outsmarted Robert Mueller and his ‘
<https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/31/us/politics/andrew-weissmann-mueller.htm
l> pitbull‘ Andrew Weissmann to end the Russia Hoax.  And, he did this all
in one weekend. 


Here’s how he did it.


One of the first things that Bill Barr did after being appointed President
Trump’s new Attorney General on Valentine’s Day in 2019, was to meet with
Robert Mueller and his team.
<https://www.usnews.com/news/national-news/articles/2019-05-01/attorney-gene
ral-william-barr-surprised-robert-mueller-didnt-decide-on-obstruction> Barr
stated that he and Mueller met a couple weeks after his appointment –

Barr, in testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee, said that he and the
Justice Department’s No. 2 official, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein,
met with Mueller as early as March 5 to discuss the findings of the special
counsel’s probe, which was nearing its conclusion after nearly two years.

Mueller had been tapped to probe Russian interference in the 2016
presidential election, potential collusion between the Kremlin and President
Donald Trump’s campaign, and possible obstruction of justice by the
president.

At the March 5 meeting, Mueller indicated that he and his team of more than
a dozen prosecutors would not bring charges against the president for
obstruction – but they wouldn’t exonerate him.

“We were frankly surprised that they were not going to reach a decision on
obstruction, and we asked them a lot on the reasoning behind this and the
basis for this,” Barr testified. “We did not understand exactly why the
special counsel was not reaching a decision, and when we pressed him on it,
he said that his team was still formulating the explanation.”

Barr then apparently requested that Mueller (no Mueller’s not a man of
integrity – his appointments to the Special Counsel absolutely prove it-
Weissmann, Strzok, Page, Rhee, etc…) complete his report and provide it with
all grand jury items notated.

Barr was also  smart enough to keep DAG Rod Rosenstein on until the Special
Counsel was over. It’s unknown why Rosenstein agreed to do this. We know
Rosenstein’s actions were corrupt. He approved the members of the Mueller
team, in spite of their numerous conflicts, in direct obstruction with the
law. Rosenstein hired Mueller who had obvious conflicts, the day after
Mueller was turned down for FBI Director. And, we now know that Rosenstein
did not replace Mueller in spite of President Trump’s requests to put
someone over the investigation who wasn’t conflicted. Despite all this, Barr
kept Rosenstein on so that he could have a co-signer on his four page
announcement of Mueller’s conclusions.

 

Mueller next tried to put President Trump and his AG Barr a precarious
position. He and Weissmann decided to provide Barr a report with no grand
jury items notated in spite of Barr requesting that Mueller provide this
information. No doubt Mueller and Weissmann wanted to put Barr in a bind.
They did this so that they and Democrats could complain about Barr taking
too long to release the report and accuse Barr of editing the report. This
is where Barr masterfully handled Mueller and his corrupt team’s political
actions.

Barr in a matter of a couple days, took the Mueller report and drafted a
separate report on March 24, 2019. He stated yesterday that he knew
Americans were eager to read the Mueller report and he wanted to get the
message out with conclusions of the report. Barr explained that this was not
a summary and rather a report with Mueller report conclusions. Barr reported
that Mueller found no evidence of collusion. He used quotes from the Mueller
report.

Barr then did something that will go down in history as one of the boldest,
most courageous and smartest moves of anyone in the past century to save the
republic. Barr released a report noting that he and Rod Rosenstein looked at
the evidence presented by Mueller on obstruction and
<https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/03/24/us/politics/barr-letter-muel
ler-report.html> in three short paragraphs he explained that he and
Rosenstein came to the conclusion that there is no legal reason to indict
the President on obstruction [emphasis added] –

The report’s second part addresses a number of actions by the President –
most of which have been the subject of public reporting – that the Special
Counsel investigated as potentially raising obstruction-of-justice concerns.
After making a “thorough factual investigation” into these matters, the
Special Counsel considered whether to evaluate the conduct under Department
standards governing prosecution and declination decisions but ultimately
determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment. The Special
Counsel therefore did not draw a conclusion – one way or the other – as to
whether the examined conduct constituted obstruction. Instead, for each of
the relevant actions investigated, the report sets out evidence on both
sides of the question and leaves unresolved what the Special Counsel views
as “difficult issues” of law and fact concerning whether the President’s
actions and intent could be viewed as obstruction. The Special Counsel
states that “while this report does not conclude that the President
committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”

The Special Counsel’s decision to describe the facts of his obstruction
investigation without reaching any legal conclusions leaves it to the
Attorney General to determine whether the conduct described in the report
constitutes a crime. Over the course of the investigation, the Special
Counsel’s office engaged in discussions with certain Department officials
regarding many of the legal and factual matters at issue in the Special
Counsel’s obstruction investigation. After reviewing the Special Counsel’s
final report on these issues; consulting with Department officials,
including the Office of Legal Counsel; and applying the principles of
federal prosecution that guide our charging decisions, Deputy Attorney
General Rod Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence developed
during the Special Counsel’s investigation is not sufficient to establish
that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense. Our
determination was made without regard to, and is not based on, the
constitutional considerations that surround the indictment and criminal
prosecution of a sitting president.2

In making this determination, we noted that the Special Counsel recognized
that “the evidence does not establish that the President was involved in an
underlying crime related to Russian election interference,” and that, while
not determinative, the absence of such evidence bears upon the President’s
intent with respect to obstruction. Generally speaking, to obtain and
sustain an obstruction conviction, the government would need to prove beyond
a reasonable doubt that a person, acting with corrupt intent, engaged in
obstructive conduct with a sufficient nexus to a pending or contemplated
proceeding. In cataloguing the President’s actions, many of which took place
in public view, the report identifies no actions that, in our judgment,
constitute obstructive conduct, had a nexus to a pending or contemplated
proceeding, and were done with corrupt intent, each of which, under the
Department’s principles of federal prosecution guiding charging decisions,
would need to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to establish an
obstruction-of-justice offense.


Boom Mueller’s plan to provide Congress with a report where the corrupt
Democrat- led House would decide Trump’s guilt on obstruction was gone –
Barr killed it – and he had Deep State Rosenstein sign off on it as well! He
rightly assessed that the President did not obstruct justice!


The next plan from the Deep State and the Mueller team to accomplish their
coup was to include shady information about President Trump and other
innocent individuals (suspected of being Trump family members like Donald
Trump Jr.). They did this in providing Barr a 400 page report that should
have been concluded in two pages. Mueller and Weissmann included numerous
questionable actions by the President and others in the report. This was a
horrible precedent that Mueller set and will go down as one of the most
corrupt actions in US history. Barr handled this by redacting information on
innocent individuals and he had Rosenstein and the Mueller team agree to the
redactions.




In another act to prevent unnecessary damage to President Trump, and manage
the message from the full Mueller report, Barr again was brilliant. He held
a presser with Rod Rosenstein and explained what he was releasing and the
report in general. Barr released the Mueller report after holding presser
and stopped the Democrats’ attempts to run the narrative on the report.

A big point that Barr addressed before the Senate was that President Trump
never attempted to shut down the investigation as was inferred in the
Mueller report. The report refers to many incidents like this that never
should have been in the report. He explained that the President (rightfully)
asked to have conflicted Mueller replaced. Rosenstein never did it and the
President never removed Mueller. Another Deep State tactic ended.


But perhaps the greatest move that Barr took in ending the Mueller
investigation happened before he was even appointed Attorney General.


An excellent analysis by  <https://humanevents.com/2019/05/01/checkmate/>
Will Chamberlain at Human Events discussed the process before Barr was
selected as Attorney General.  After Rosenstein created the Mueller Special
Counsel in 2017 the Trump team believed that the investigation would soon be
over, so the President and his team provided all the information that
Mueller asked for thinking that the investigation would soon be over based
on the fact that the President never colluded with any Russians during the
2016 Presidential campaign.

However, after a few months and based on responses from the Mueller gang,
the Trump team realized that Mueller wasn’t interested in collusion, they
were going for obstruction.  So the Trump team in response argued that the
Mueller could not indict President Trump for obstruction, not only because
he is President and the law prevents Presidents from being indicted during
their term in office, but more importantly because the law does not provide
for obstruction in the manner Mueller and his pitbull were indicating.

So the Trump team argued this with Mueller but were ignored.  So next the
Trump team, as suspected by Chamberlain, reached out to members in the legal
community to opine on the obstruction law.  At this point, former Attorney
General Barr, who served under George Herbert Bush, provided a document
where he argued that the law that Mueller was attempting to use to indict
President Trump was being bastardized.

Barr argued that the law used by Mueller was being used too broadly.  This
letter from Barr was provided to Rosenstein who ignored it and allowed
Mueller to continue their obstruction case using the obstruction law as they
saw fit.  Next came the 2018 election and then President Trump removed
worthless AG Sessions.   <https://humanevents.com/2019/05/01/checkmate/>
Chamberlain noted –

The day after the midterms, Jeff Sessions was asked for his resignation.
Less than a month later, Bill Barr was nominated as his replacement.
Everyone talked about how he was the “
<https://www.cnn.com/2018/12/07/politics/william-barr-attorney-general-nomin
ation/index.html> consensus choice” in the administration. No other
candidate was ever seriously floated.

Trump appointed Barr and he was eventually sworn in on Valentine’s Day 2019.
After Barr met with Mueller and Mueller quickly provided his report, Barr
responded immediately with his four page report.  But the surprise to
Mueller and Weissmann, who dedicated 20 pages in their report to the
legality of bastardizing the obstruction clause, Barr never even touched it.
He stayed away from arguing the legality of obstruction and said as noted
above that Mueller’s evidence didn’t establish obstruction because they
couldn’t establish intent. 


AG Bill Barr outsmarted Mueller and his pitbull, ended the Russia Collusion
Delusion and saved the country. 


EM         -> { Trump for 2020 }

On the 49th Parallel          

                 Thé Mulindwas Communication Group
"With Yoweri Museveni, Ssabassajja and Dr. Kiiza Besigye, Uganda is in
anarchy"
                    Kuungana Mulindwa Mawasiliano Kikundi
"Pamoja na Yoweri Museveni, Ssabassajja na Dk. Kiiza Besigye, Uganda ni
katika machafuko" 

 

_______________________________________________
Ugandanet mailing list
Ugandanet@kym.net
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet

UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/ugandanet@kym.net/

The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------

Reply via email to