Eddie Epstein wrote:
We had previously discussed that using the base CAS as a single global view was not useful for applications because of potential collisions, and therefore recommended that a collection of multi-view analytics that need a single "global" view should create a named view for that purpose.
So far I'm with you. Marshall had mentioned this as well. I kind of like the idea, I'm just wondering how complex this will be to specify. To me, the core idea is that a view holds a subset of all indexes. Those indexes could be shared by other views, if that makes sense.
Doesn't that previous discussion read on the topic of global indexes?
Is it my brain, or this sentence, that doesn't make any sense ;-) Could you explain?
--Thilo
