Eddie Epstein wrote:
But this only works when we do not support distributed type definitions, so that the same type can be defined/extended by another bundle. Right?Right, a type definition would not be extensible. It would be defined in only one place.
Right, but we've been over that. Although I don't like distributed definitions, either, it seems we're stuck with them for the time being. Without distributed type definitions, a lot of things are easier, with or without OSGi ;-)
--Thilo
