I don't know if that change cause any issues in our plugins, but I would
prefer to do the change. It minimize the errors and the manual effort
when doing a release.
-- Michael
Marshall Schor wrote:
The basic maven build creates Jars in the target with alternate names:
project uimaj-core => drop the "j" from uimaj, and don't suffix the
version -> uima-core.jar
An exception to this is jVinci - jVinci becomes jVinci.jar (no version)
Another exception: when the uimaj-ep-runtime plugin is built, it has
Jars in with the names:
project uimaj-core => uimaj-core-{version}.jar
These names have to match entries in the manifest.
I'm working on improvements to our maven POMs to more automate the
builds. I've been able to build the uimaj-ep-runtime jar so it
contains the other jars, but it puts in the jars as named by the other
projects, so it has, e.g., uima-core.jar (no j, and no version).
This would make our uimaj-ep-plugin internal jars follow our other jar
naming conventions, and would reduce the need to have uimaj-ep-runtime
manifest updated to change version numbers.
Is this OK to do, or is there a reason we keep the uimaj-ep-runtime
inner jars naming conventions different?
-Marshall
