On Jan 21, 2008, at 10:58 AM, Michael Baessler wrote:
Is this OK to do, or is there a reason we keep the uimaj-ep-runtime
inner jars naming conventions different?
The motivation was to add a PDE nature to the eclipse plugin projects
with the maven eclipse plugin. The only way I found
to make it work was to add the version in the manifest.
The other side is that it never worked very well to add a PDE nature
from the maven plugin, there were still some problems
left and it does not work correctly, e.g Classpath problems in
eclipse, Cas Editor export does not work, etc.
I think it would be ok to remove the version number and remove the pde
stuff from the POM file and search another way
to address the pde project nature issue.
What do you think ?
Jörn
