Jörn Kottmann wrote: > > On Oct 10, 2008, at 3:28 PM, Julien Nioche wrote: > >> Hi Jorn, >> >> The MarkupAnnotator could be useful for many UIMA users, including me. >> Maybe >>> it would be nice if its possible to configure the types used for markup. >> >> >> that's a general issue with UIMA and most AEs rely on a preexisting >> typeset. >> The solution would be to have a generic resource for mapping between >> files >> (e.g. feature named X in type T is the same as feature Y in type U) or >> rule >> based system allowing you to do manipulate annotations (like JAPE in >> GATE). > > No, I was talking about a type mapping which could be configured in the > descriptor > for example. > > Is there anything which must be discussed before Julien can > start the vote ?
I haven't had time to look at the code myself, but you and Thomas have, and I have seen other contributions of Julien, so that's good enough for me. We've been talking about a Tika annotator for a while, so let's go for it. Please do start a formal vote. Julien, since you are contributing more, it would be good if you could send in an ICLA (individual contributor licensing agreement). It's a relatively painless form that you need to send to the ASF secretary which helps us to keep our IP story clean. See the UIMA web site http://incubator.apache.org/uima/get-involved.html and the ASF page here: http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas --Thilo > > Jörn >
