Jörn Kottmann wrote: >> * We have had some earlier discussions about changing >> our release packaging a bit. This concerns the sandbox >> in particular, as there are things in there that are >> quite stable enough to graduate from there to a place >> still to be created. This needs to be discussed, I don't >> have a concrete proposal. > > In my opinion we should remove the OpenNLP sample annotators, > since we cannot ship OpenNLP with UIMA and the code > is based on the outdated 1.3 version. Beside that will OpenNLP release > a UIMA integration based on 1.4 in the near future.
+1 We should also point to OpenNLP from our "external links" website. > >> * If we have the time and the volunteers, we should >> take a look at our Eclipse based tooling. Can we add >> the CAS Editor to our standard tooling? > > I would love to see graduation of the Cas Editor. During the change > to the eclipse plugin I also changed the build system to maven, which > means that it is now build in the same way our other eclipse plugins are > build. > > To make the eclipse plugin also a tool which can be used during the > development > of the UIMA applications a user must add the cas editor nature to the > project > and configure all needed dependencies, like type system and styling. > This could be eased through a "Add Cas Editor Nature" action like its > done for PDE. > >> Can we incorporate >> code/ideas from the CAS Viewer as we had planned some >> time ago? > > Yes that would be cool, but I do not know the CAS Viewer well, so maybe > Tong can point out a few things he wants in the Cas Editor, then I could > work with him on integrating it. > > Jörn
