On 2 Apr 2013, at 13:08, Stephen Wilcox <[email protected]> wrote:

> Don't know what you mean Paul ;)
> 
> Looks okay from my network (LON-DXB):
> 
> traceroute to s1.dma.dxb (91.196.184.67), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
>  1  gw.serversa.lon.ixreach.com (91.196.185.1)  7.045 ms  7.675 ms  10.324 ms
>  2  host-91-196-187-150.in-addr.ixreach.com (91.196.187.150)  0.295 ms  0.282 
> ms  0.385 ms
>  3  host-91-196-187-106.in-addr.ixreach.com (91.196.187.106)  10.874 ms  
> 10.873 ms  15.447 ms
>  4  host-91-196-187-194.in-addr.ixreach.com (91.196.187.194)  6.292 ms  6.280 
> ms  6.410 ms
>  5  host-91-196-187-198.in-addr.ixreach.com (91.196.187.198)  6.675 ms  6.722 
> ms  6.920 ms
>  6  s1.dma.dxb.ixreach.com (91.196.184.67)  158.645 ms  159.185 ms  159.498 ms
> 
> FYI most routes are now back albeit on alternative paths so there shouldn't 
> be much ongoing issue to the region..

Damn, that reverse DNS is *ugly* though ;)

Reply via email to