Adrian,

Is that with the magic help of a Firebrick, or would it be possible with a 
Cisco or Juniper device?  I've done a bit of googling and it would seem there's 
little if any material on how to do it.  As far as I can tell LAGs are only 
possible on a per-port basis (at least on Cisco switches).

C

--
Charlie Boisseau

Fluency Communications Ltd.
e. [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
w. http://fluency.net.uk/
t. 0845 874 7000

This Email and files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended for 
the sole use of the individual or organisation addressed. If you have received 
this Email in error please notify the sender immediately and delete it without 
using, copying, storing, forwarding or disclosing its contents to any other 
person While Fluency has endeavoured to ensure that any attachments do not 
contain viruses it will not be liable for any losses incurred by the recipient. 
Fluency Communications Ltd. Registered in Scotland. Company Number: SC390685. 
Registered Office Address: 1 Broughton Market, Edinburgh, EH3 6NU

On 13 May 2013, at 22:54, Adrian Kennard <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

On 2013-05-13 18:02, Charlie Boisseau wrote:

This sounds really mucky; but has anyone thought of EVC bonding?
Something like a LAG but with VLANs instead of physical ports.  This
could supersede the likes of EFM if done right.

We have FTTC Etherways, but not sure I have any bonded yet, but yes, we
could bond at an Ethernet level like a LAG no problem.

Reply via email to