We only use FireBricks, and I have no idea on cisco boxes - don't have any :-)
I didn't expect anything less! Presumably you could make an LAG on two ports, and have those cabled to ports that are each untagged on a VLAN that then routes through to the FTTC lines at the far end. That should work, shouldn't it? Yeah; it's a pretty grubby hack, but would probably work. Patching switchports to other switchports scares the bejezuz out of me though! Could always throw another switch into the stack just for terminating bonded customers. C -- Charlie Boisseau Fluency Communications Ltd. e. [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> w. http://fluency.net.uk/ t. 0845 874 7000 This Email and files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended for the sole use of the individual or organisation addressed. If you have received this Email in error please notify the sender immediately and delete it without using, copying, storing, forwarding or disclosing its contents to any other person While Fluency has endeavoured to ensure that any attachments do not contain viruses it will not be liable for any losses incurred by the recipient. Fluency Communications Ltd. Registered in Scotland. Company Number: SC390685. Registered Office Address: 1 Broughton Market, Edinburgh, EH3 6NU On 14 May 2013, at 09:23, Adrian Kennard <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: On 14/05/13 08:20, Charlie Boisseau wrote: Adrian, Is that with the magic help of a Firebrick, or would it be possible with a Cisco or Juniper device? I've done a bit of googling and it would seem there's little if any material on how to do it. As far as I can tell LAGs are only possible on a per-port basis (at least on Cisco switches). Presumably you could make an LAG on two ports, and have those cabled to ports that are each untagged on a VLAN that then routes through to the FTTC lines at the far end. That should work, shouldn't it?
