IPV6 will be here when its needed, the forum you need to convince to do it is called the market.
A colleague in another place made an interesting comment which was their biggest challenge with IPV6 demployment has been the doomsday spouted by forums that says OMFG we are going to run out of IP addresses only for that date to move back and back. Whilst I know its going to happen I have some sympathy for that point of view. < Shoot me now! Regards, Neil PS. I might compare the GDP of peru and the ukŠ just saying! On 04/09/2014 14:24, "Martin J. Levy" <[email protected]> wrote: >and while I'm on the subject ... at least 6UK removed/deleted their >domain when they turned off the lights. > > >http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/2230838/uk-ipv6-transition-group- >6uk-pulls-its-own-plug > >http://www.6uk.org.uk/2012/12/6uk-powerless-to-encourage-ipv6-adoption-boa >rd-resigns/ > >Sigh. > >Martin > >> On Sep 4, 2014, at 4:07 PM, Chris Russell <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 04/09/2014 13:59, Martin J. Levy wrote: >>> >>> UK IPv6 Taskforce >>> http://www.uk.ipv6tf.org/ >> >> Arguably replaced by the UK IPv6 Council, which will be introduced >>further at UKNOF29 Belfast next week: >> >> >>https://indico.uknof.org.uk/contributionDisplay.py?contribId=19&confId=31 >> >>> PS: >>> >>>https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html#tab=per-country-ipv6 >>>-adoption >>> ... UK @ 0.19% ... Peru @ 7.04% ... just saying. >> >> Google may see more ipv6 email sent to them if most people didn't have >>to downgrade to push v4 to them due to gmail filters putting a lot of >>ipv6 email into Junk. >> >> 8) >> >> Chris >> >> >
