On 7 Sep 2014, at 11:19, Will Hargrave <[email protected]> wrote: > Neil, > > I don’t “mistakenly assume” anything. If anyone "mistakenly assumes" > something it is most likely as a result of your content-free emails, where > teasing back layers of defensive ego-preening in order to obtain data germane > to the subject matter at hand is an arduous chore. > > > What you seem to be saying is ‘these US providers have a larger profit margin > and they have wasted this money on IPv6 deployment’. I find it hard to > believe they would do this at such detriment of shareholder value. > > Are you realistically saying Comcast rolled out v6 to as many customers as BT > has broadband subscribers (~6m), without a business case for doing so? > OK, let’s exclude the US then. Those Americans well known for their callous > disregard of profit anyway. > > DTAG has 26% deployment. Free has 39%. Swisscom 27%. [1] > Why are DT or Swisscom doing this where BT isn’t?
Don’t forget there are a number of big companies who are embracing IPv6 and deploying within their organisations e.g. Continental, BMW, Goldman Sachs, Space.Net. Many organisations can see a business case for IPv6. Scott
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
