On 7 Sep 2014, at 12:34, Will Hargrave <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 7 Sep 2014, at 12:01, Neil J. McRae <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> I don’t “mistakenly assume” anything. If anyone "mistakenly assumes" >>> something it is most likely as a result of your content-free emails, where >>> teasing back layers of defensive ego-preening in order to obtain data >>> germane to the subject matter at hand is an arduous chore. >> In that case Will I'll stop wasting any more time on this! How is that for >> content free now? > > I’m sad that you think providing intellectual input to back up your > assertions is a waste of time. > > “I really have no idea why Comcast and DTAG have deployed IPv6 to more > end-users than we have broadband subs in our whole network. They must be > using some kind of magic. Sorcery! I refuse to discuss it!” - Neil ”Sent > from my ipad" McRae, BT
I hear Comcast have IPv6 enabled twice as many end users as BT has users. Having spoken to some of the Comcast support people, as part of an ISOC-led project to develop generic tools and advice for ISP help desks, they don’t seem to have any significant problems. If there is hard evidence of such issues, it would be interesting to see it, rather than just recounting handwavey anecdotes. Meanwhile, it seems Linkedin are now happy to go live, see http://engineering.linkedin.com/ipv6/permanent-launch-ipv6 Tim
