Hi > On 23 Mar 2015, at 20:05, Martin A. Brooks <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello > > >> From: "Rich Lewis" <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Sent: Monday, 23 March, 2015 1:39:29 PM >> Subject: [uknof] The operator's operator >> >> I guess a brief list of requirements are: >> >> * FTTC or equivalent speeds (I'm in a London suburb, so Virgin are in >> the street and fibre is to the cabinent, but not, alas, to the >> premises) >> * Native IPv6 definitely a plus, if not now, then soonest >> * Not behind a CGN > > > If you didn't need IPv6 then I would say "Zen" without any qualms. > > Alas Zen's IPv6 deployment has been woeful, and there's no upcoming service > in sight. I very very regretfully voted with my feet to A&A who have had > native IPv6 for a long time. > > If and when Zen get native IPv6, it's very likely I would go back. > > Regards > > -- > > -- > Martin A. Brooks > http://antibodyMX.net/ - antispam & antivirus email filtering. > Just out of interest would I be right in guessing that your regret in moving to A&A is purely the monthly cost increase?
Regards
