Only British citizens can be CERT certified so if you don't need it or may
miss out on some really good pentesters.
On Sep 29, 2015 5:26 PM, "Alex Brooks" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 8:43 PM, Rich Lewis <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> <SNIP>
> > I wondered if anyone on the list could recommend an organisation to do
> > some penetration testing for us. We've used Pen Test Partners in the
> > past, and they seemed pretty good to me, but for reasons unknown the
> > auditors want us to use someone else this time round.
> <SNIP>
>
> Sometimes, when an ISP reaches a certain public sector customer base
> (or becomes so big it forms part of the CNI), the ISP may end up
> needing to use an HMG accredited pen tester.  However, others can
> engage these companies services.  These accredited providers, as well
> as being approved to pen test systems handling OFFICIAL and (under
> supervision) SECRET information, also get access to specialist
> briefings covering things like GovCERT alerts, respected
> vulnerabilities sources and other support material.
>
> Even if you only have private sector customers, it is quite easy to
> end up transmitting or processing sensitive public sector data; for
> example if you provide an encrypted link between two sites for a
> company managing payroll for a public sector body.
>
> A similar scheme accrediting pen tests for the private sector, CREST,
> exists and some pen testers are on both lists, including some
> mentioned in this thread.
>
> Although you don't need this level of paper assurance, if you have a
> choice of providers and are having difficulty picking, you may wish to
> consider using the one on the CHECK list at
> https://www.cesg.gov.uk/finda/Pages/CHECKResults.aspx?post=1&sort=name
> and the CREST list at
>
> http://www.crest-approved.org/crest-member-companies/members-supplying-penetration-testing-services/index.html
> rather than the one that isn't listed on either.  It should certainly
> help keep the auditors happy.
>
> HTH,
>
> Alex
>
>

Reply via email to