On 28/Apr/16 11:31, Paul Bone wrote:
> I am using some Juniper SRX240 as PE nodes and running the Internet in > VRF. > > > > I have two Juniper MX5 MP-BGP route reflectors which also receive the > full internet table plus default into VRF and export just my local > routes (BGP and direct) and a default route (BGP) into the VRF. > > > > The problem I have is that the SRX240 is receiving the default route > from both route reflectors but is actually preferring and forwarding > traffic to the route reflector with the lowest router ID (show route > detail confirms this) and ignoring the underlying IGP metrics from the > global OSPF table. > > > > This is causing sub-optimal routing of traffic. > > > > Has anyone experienced this before? > I'd typically not announce default routes in my iBGP if I'm carrying a full BGP table (except under special circumstances which your topology does not qualify for). Sounds like your RR's are overwriting the NEXT_HOP attribute for the default routes. Is this the case? Mark.
