Hi Tom,

I just tried simple queues and I can use download and upload limits in the same 
queue which is simpler config and the winbox graphs could be quite handy.

One thing I do notice is that the upload speed test is behaving like a policer 
whereas the queue tree appeared to be shaped on upload – I guess that is 
because the simple queue is only acting in one place.

Best regards, Paul
Paul Bone | Connectivity Manager | mobile: +44 7713 393621
Bridge Fibre Ltd<http://www.bridgefibre.co.uk> | service desk: 01223 755075 | 
office: 01223 755055

CLARITY • PARTNERSHIP • QUALITY
Thinking of moving services to a Data Centre? Please ask for information on our 
Colocation services<http://www.bridgefibre.co.uk/colocation-services/>

2015 ISPA Awards Winner - Best Enterprise 
Broadband<http://www.ispa.org.uk/ispa-awards/>


From: Tom Smyth [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 17 May 2016 13:40
To: Paul Bone <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [uknof] Mikrotik as Service Provider Router

Hi Paul

Queue trees were originally perferred but as far as im aware they are sitll 
single core... and that multiple simple queues will give better performance 
over queue trees with sub queues .. as far as im aware are using the same core 
as the partent queue (sharingt he same core)

.

On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Paul Bone 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Tom,

These are smaller sites and most customers only have 1 IP address each so it 
will be matching on /32 networks on the whole.

I have tested using Queue Trees with separate download and upload parent PCQ 
queues with individual upload/download default queues for each customer – I 
need to be able to provide guaranteed minimums to each customer when I contend 
them together so that I can maximise the bandwidth I have available to the 
site. Will the child queues use different cores or would it be driven by the 
parent queue?

I will have a look at setting this up using simple queues.

Best regards, Paul
Paul Bone | Connectivity Manager | mobile: +44 7713 
393621<tel:%2B44%207713%20393621>
Bridge Fibre Ltd<http://www.bridgefibre.co.uk> | service desk: 01223 755075 | 
office: 01223 755055

CLARITY • PARTNERSHIP • QUALITY
Thinking of moving services to a Data Centre? Please ask for information on our 
Colocation services<http://www.bridgefibre.co.uk/colocation-services/>

2015 ISPA Awards Winner - Best Enterprise 
Broadband<http://www.ispa.org.uk/ispa-awards/>


From: Tom Smyth 
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: 17 May 2016 13:22
To: Paul Bone <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [uknof] Mikrotik as Service Provider Router

Hi Paul
if you are using traffic shaping on the CCRs use Simplequeues... and create 
lots of them... you are btter off spliting the queues into multiple queues so 
that they get pushed onto other cores...
ie if you have a /22 for giving bandiwdth to a campus...  create 16 queues with 
/26 networks as the target of the queues so that it will use 16 cores for the 
queue and not just 1 core for the /22 ...
oh yeah lab up VRFs and route leaking if you are planning to use them on your 
CCRs

Hope tis helps...

On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Paul Bone 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Thanks for all the replies on this one, nice to hear good reports.

I have no intention of running full table in these as I have invested in 
Juniper MX routers for this job but as a CE or PE the CCR looks a very good 
option. Our service is generally multi-tenant buildings and parks so the 
traffic shaping capabilities are certainly interesting if I can work this 
feature directly into the CE or PE.

Best regards, Paul








--
Kindest regards,
Tom Smyth

Mobile: +353 87 6193172<tel:%2B353%2087%206193172>
---------------------------------
PLEASE CONSIDER THE ENVIRONMENT BEFORE YOU PRINT THIS E-MAIL
This email contains information which may be confidential or privileged. The 
information is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named 
above.  If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that
any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this 
information is prohibited. If you have received this electronic transmission in 
error, please notify me by telephone or by electronic mail immediately. Any 
opinions expressed are those of the author, not the company's  .This email does 
not constitute either offer or acceptance of any contractually binding 
agreement. Such offer or acceptance must be communicated in
writing. You are requested to carry out your own virus check before opening any 
attachment. Thomas Smyth accepts no liability for any loss or damage which may 
be caused by malicious software or attachments.



--
Kindest regards,
Tom Smyth

Mobile: +353 87 6193172
---------------------------------
PLEASE CONSIDER THE ENVIRONMENT BEFORE YOU PRINT THIS E-MAIL
This email contains information which may be confidential or privileged. The 
information is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named 
above.  If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that
any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this 
information is prohibited. If you have received this electronic transmission in 
error, please notify me by telephone or by electronic mail immediately. Any 
opinions expressed are those of the author, not the company's  .This email does 
not constitute either offer or acceptance of any contractually binding 
agreement. Such offer or acceptance must be communicated in
writing. You are requested to carry out your own virus check before opening any 
attachment. Thomas Smyth accepts no liability for any loss or damage which may 
be caused by malicious software or attachments.

Reply via email to