On 09/02/2016 12:24 PM, Nigel Titley wrote: > I've already kicked off a request to find out what's happening. I > suspect it's a simple misunderstanding of some sort, that's what > these things usually boil down to. They can't possibly really want > what you think they do. > > Despite Neil's remarks, the NCC doesn't gratuitously make work, they > just take their job of making sure the registry is as accurate as > possible very seriously.
I'm not suggesting it's necessary in this particular case, but it's also
worth mentioning in case some folks are not aware, that the RIPE NCC has
an Arbitration Panel (which I serve on) and Process:
https://www.ripe.net/about-us/legal/arbitration
which is available for escalating disputes which cannot otherwise be
resolved between NCC members and/or the NCC itself. IME, as and Nigel
says, a lot of these things boil down to misunderstandings across
language/culture/jurisdiction/policy barriers.
Keith
<<attachment: keith.vcf>>
