I do draw the line at armed guards.

As a wise man once told me, the primary threat to data centres is not physical, 
it is cyber.  And as another even wiser man once told me, communication 
facilities are not a terrorist target, as the point of terrorism is to spread 
terror, and you can't do that if you have destroyed the communication channels 
for that terror.

-----Original Message-----
From: uknof [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Howard Jones
Sent: 22 September 2017 09:36
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [uknof] Telehouse Fire Alarm

On 22/09/2017 09:20, John Bourke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What strikes me is the inconsistency in procedures and security in data 
> centres around the world.
>
> In some you need to watch a safety video before you are allowed in for the 
> first time.
>
I used to visit Virgin Media exchanges from time to time (when they were 
Telewest), and you had to do the safety induction every 6 months, which meant 
every visit for me, pretty much. It wasn't a video - someone walked you around 
the facility: don't touch that. If someone else touches that, do this. etc. I 
think we were the only external customer in the building.

Inconsistency in procedures translates to flexibility in pricing though. 
Not everyone wants to pay for armed guards and biometrics.

Reply via email to