> On 15 Nov 2017, at 12:22, Bill Woodcock <[email protected]> wrote: > > Uh, none of that is relevant to the discussion. Call it pretty > infrastructure or tasty infrastructure or whatever pleases you. > > The question is what types of private-sector infrastructure you most strongly > feel should not be subject to governmental cyber attacks. > > -Bill
Are the sort of people who would consider attacking private-sector infrastructure the sort of people who will pay any attention to any form of globally managed legislation, policy or regulation? Maybe you’re proposing this would be a mechanism for turning it into state-level legislation, policy or regulation? - Mark
