There is no doubt about the fact that we're heading into one of the biggest 
global turndowns, some economists estimating 20% - the banking crisis was 3.4% 
by comparison. 

We've been lazy on collaboration and frankly well over invested. I know of few 
other industries that has the volume of face to face meetings that ours has 
(even Pharma and that industry makes real money!). I don't go in person to that 
many events anymore because all you get it the same old content over and over 
again. And anything that’s new you can, these days, for most big meetings jump 
on the webcast or watch it on youtube afterwards. 

But for a minute forget money, forget travelling, thinking of output:

In several standards areas we are already seeing a significant improvement on 
quality and speed of output as more things switch to almost a Ci/CD real time 
type approach rather than waiting for some meeting three months away where the 
output is significantly less valuable and often watered or compromised 
downwards.

Whether or not the money exists, the simple fact is that much more is getting 
done in many of these meeting driven bodies now day by day in the short space 
of a month than in the old model that hasn't changed in twenty years.  I 
totally disagree with Denesh's point on the powers that be not caring, frankly 
that’s total nonsense in my view.

There is a primary concern also, irrespective of money, some folks simply won't 
want to travel any more, many companies and organisations will need to think 
carefully about their staff travelling both from a wellbeing point of view and 
from a liability point of view, and as a wider business risk.

No organisation is going to able to ignore ensuring that their events are 
remote participant inclusive in a much bigger way than has been in the past. 

If you think that next year all will be the back to the same old then I think 
you are kidding yourself on.  

I play videogames and pinball all over the world, all of our events have pretty 
much been written off until next year. So on the pinball font since we once 
though being in the room together was a mandatory requirement, now that we 
can't we're breaking through the barriers that stopped that being the case and 
held two trial events online that were fantastic, pinball is probably the most 
archaic anti-new technology hobby you can be involved in but if they can do it 
well - it's time for our industry to do the same and figure out what the things 
are that we are going to miss and figure out ways of minimising that or coping 
with it, because it's going to be very much the new norm. 

Regards,
Neil.

On 15/04/2020, 11:32, "uknof on behalf of Denesh Bhabuta" 
<[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:


    > On 15 Apr 2020, at 10:59, Mark Tinka <[email protected]> wrote:
    >> 
    >> The above is not to say that we should not try.. but we need to be aware 
of what we gain and what we lose in the process.. and shape the nature of 
events accordingly.. and evolve with all of that in mind.
    > This, here, is the meat.
    > The Coronavirus is accelerating and amplifying the shift in models; in
    > many cases, much to our chagrin. But, while we've all been talking and
    > hypothesizing about this for years, no one can claim delusion because,
    > well, we are all now living it, daily.
    > The outcome? To some degree, I believe there will be a huge drive for
    > improvement in efficiencies, because while we are struggling to keep
    > incomes coming in consistently on the back of all the lockdowns, our
    > CFO's are not going to be too unhappy to see that the 1st quarter of
    > 2020 saw a travel and logistics cost savings of well over 90%; and we
    > didn't all fall over and die.
    > So while physical interaction is certainly the holy grail, I anticipate
    > that we will be forced to be smarter about how we collaborate. I mean,
    > it's not like we don't have a live example. That cat's well and truly
    > out the bag now :-).

    I agree to an extent. We have all collaborated online for decades.

    However, despite all that online collaboration, we all find it better when 
we are physically in the same place. There is something about face-to-face 
physical presence which .. for me at least.. is not met by just collaborating 
online.

    I think this is because we are generally social animals and spreading that 
collaboration over a longer period of time - say during the conference / 
meeting, and then over a relaxed coffee / drink / social setting - helps a lot.

    The call for financial efficiencies will certainly be coming from TPTB… but 
these are the same people who very likely do not understand education and 
knowledge sharing and the best way for participants to benefit from it. These 
are the people who very likely do not understand psychology. All they care 
about is the numbers… not the people. Most of them likely already do not send 
their staff to meetings and tell them to catch up some other time.

    These meetings are not only about learning either.. they are about building 
(good) peer relationships.

    While I am enjoying the slower pace of life, I must say that I do miss the 
meeting up with people. I am keeping in touch with people online, via various 
online tools.. but it is just not the same. Additionally, I am now getting 
online fatigue! I seem to be sat in my Home Office day in and day out, 
attending lots of online meetings and webinars, socialising online.. not 
getting the benefits I personally get from attending things physically.. and am 
starting to feel the overload.. things take longer.. and I do not think I am 
the only one. 

    Although this does not really apply to me, the various “rest periods” which 
form part of usual working day pre COVID-19 are no longer there..

    All of these need to be taken in to account, IMHO.

    Regards
    Denesh

    PS. Yes, VR is likely to be the way forward.. we just need to get better at 
it.

Reply via email to