Neil J. McRae said: > Giles, interesting correlation ??? would be very interesting to find out if > this was the cause. I???d find that quite surprising if it was the case but > very interesting. 5% of the population might fit into this bracket but I???d > expect them to be shared between all the operators perhaps making the size of > the population on each operator quite small, and not sure large enough to > make such something noticeable.
Actually, it should be about 5% of the population on each operator, assuming there's nothing (such as geographical distribution) to disturb the relationship. Yes, they have to be shared out, but so does the population! -- Clive D.W. Feather | If you lie to the compiler, Email: [email protected] | it will get its revenge. Web: http://www.davros.org | - Henry Spencer Mobile: +44 7973 377646
