I'd say it depends massively on what protocols,
features/applications you're using or will need to use in the future,
depending on what's required there are potentially other options. The MX
can do pretty much anything but if you don't need a lot of functionality
and just need an IGP + BGP + throughput then that potentially opens the
door to other vendors outside of Juniper and Cisco e.g. Arista. If you want
a mature MPLS stack then I'd take Arista back off the list etc.

On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 2:44 PM Andy Hunter <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi All
>
>
>
> I know I have seen this question posted before, and have seen various
> responses, I just wanted to check if anything had changed with advice.
>
>
>
> We are upgrading our network to accommodate 100Gb, and are replacing our
> existing Cisco infrastructure, whilst investigating this we have been
> seduced with the power vs capability of the Juniper vs Cisco Question. For
> us this is between Juniper MX480 / 960 Premium models vs Cisco ASR 9006.
>
>
>
> My question is twofold – What are other people using, and have you got any
> gotchas to keep an eye out for, and, are we missing any other vendors.
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance
>
>
>
> Andy
>
>
>
>
>
> *Andy Hunter*
> *Technical Director*
>
> *IT Professional Services*
> Unit 2A & Unit 2B
> Waterside Drive
> Metrocentre East Business Park
> Gateshead
> Tyne & Wear
> NE11 9HU
>
> *T. *0191 442 8300
> *F. *0191 442 8301
>
>
>
>
>
> * <http://twitter.com/#!/itpsltd>
> <http://www.facebook.com/pages/ITPS/180607505381380>
> <http://uk.linkedin.com/in/itpsltd> Company No. 3930001
> <3930001> registered in England VAT No. 734 1935 33 <734%201935%2033>
> Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this email are not necessarily those
> of ITPS. All emails received and sent to / from ITPS are monitored for
> information security purposes. This email is intended only for the named
> addressee - if you are not this person please inform us via
> [email protected] <[email protected]>. Please don’t copy or distribute
> it. After letting us know it’s not for you, please delete the e-mail.
> Emails should not be considered to be totally secure as they pass through
> third party Internet services where it is possible they can be viewed. It
> is also possible for emails to be delayed, lost, or be potentially altered
> by unauthorised third parties whilst in transit. For secure email
> facilities please contact us and we can discuss how we can help you secure
> your emails. While ITPS takes all reasonable steps to minimise virus
> transmission risks, we can’t accept liability for any issues or losses you
> or your organisation may have as a result of a virus being contained within
> an email, any attachment the email may contain and or any data corruption
> or third-party interference with the email content.'. If the disclaimer
> can't be applied, take no action. *
>

Reply via email to