On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 04:41:58PM -0500, Dave Goel wrote:
> Rob Sherwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > I am fairly sure that Etch includes the 2.6 kernel, 
> 
> My understanding is that both sarge (stable) and etch include 2.6.  I
> use sarge with 2.6.  BTW, the way to install 2.6 by default during the
> install is to switch to the linux26 mode.
> 
> Now that you are in sarge (or etch) with 2.4, you can install 2.6 by
> simply apt-get installing the appropriate package.

The "appropriate" package was not clear : If I want to upgrade foo, I
should just run `$apt upgrade foo`, where $apt is your choice of apt-get,
aptitude or what have you[1].  That was not the case here.  I even tried
(as you must have read in my mail) `$apt upgrade foo/version` and a host
of variants to no avail.  But, it turns out that with the case of the
kernel, "foo" is a virtual package, and can't be upgraded this way and
I had to do as Nick suggested (thanks Nick) and do `$apt install bar`,
(bar="foo-version") because the debian people keep mixing version numbers
into their package names for some unknown reason.  IIRC, kernel-image-2.4
and kernel-image-2.6 are totally different packages, as opposed to two
different versions of the same package.  This is dumb.

- Rob
.


[1] All of the docs say that aptitude is the currently bless thing,
so I've been using that.

Reply via email to