> Luis, that was exactly the reason I sent the previous email so let me > say it again. > > "Hiding" it under Independent features is a bad thing, it looks like > it is not very important or that could be done along with other ideas > also under independent features. > Someone that proposes to do this testing project should be aware that > just doing tests without thinking is pointless, it won't help us at > all. Instead, this testing project should be considering as something > that will take the entire GSoC schedule and more. Someone that > presents a thorough proposal regarding testing umit should be given > higher priority over other ideas, in my opinion.
I know test is important. I'm only concerned that it is a boring work, and someone dealing with test suites all over the summer will fail just because it is boring to do the same thing all the time and still keep the ball rolling. If someone is going to do this, I would require this person to be someone who already contributes to Umit and I would set straight goals with him and watch him closely to help him to not lose the focus. Don't know if we have people here willing to take this duty. Cheers! --- Adriano Monteiro Marques http://www.thoughtspad.com http://www.umitproject.org http://blog.umitproject.org http://www.pythonbenelux.org "Don't stay in bed, unless you can make money in bed." - George Burns ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com _______________________________________________ Umit-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/umit-devel
