Refactoring is complete [1]. You could start from revision 5326. [1] http://trac.umitproject.org/changeset/5326
-- Best regards, Francesco Piccinno 2009/8/17 Shu Yang Quek <[email protected]>: > OK by me. Thanks. > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 2:23 AM, Luis A. Bastiao Silva <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Hi Dave and Shu, >> >> I talked with Francesco. He is going to procedure with new structure and >> probably finish it until 18th/19th. >> >> Is it okay? >> >> On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 6:53 PM, devtar <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Guys, >>> >>> Do I have the mandate to proceed with the structural fix? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Dave >>> >>> On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 10:37 AM, devtar <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Luis, >>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> > > Another question is where I can put the Python C source files to >>>>>> > > be built? Is there a preferred path for these C files? I was going >>>>>> > > to create >>>>>> > > a PM/btc directory. >>>>>> >>>>>> I have thought about this issue and decided to take a holistic view >>>>>> on it and came out with the proposed structure as stated below. I believe >>>>>> that it should be under umit.bt_sniffer since the Python C source are of >>>>>> the >>>>>> core\backend. This structure is analogous to the relationship UMPA and PM >>>>>> has. The child structure(.core and .firmware) would have more depth as >>>>>> the >>>>>> project progresses and this structure would permit the extensiveness of >>>>>> the >>>>>> project. >>>>>> >>>>>> umit.bt_sniffer -> Bluetooth Sniffer >>>>>> >>>>>> umit.bt_sniffer.core >>>>>> umit.bt_sniffer.firmware >>>>>> >>>>>> umit.pm -> The Packet Manipulation Interface. >>>>>> >>>>>> umit.pm.backend >>>>>> umit.pm.core >>>>>> umit.pm.bt_sniffer_gui -> Bluetooth Sniffer >>>>> >>>>> What should be interface of Bluetooth Sniffer? >>>>> If it is necessary probably should be written in umit.pm.bt_sniffer.gui >>>>> or something like that >>>> >>>> >>>> Sure, that can work. I have suggested bt_sniffer_gui as it does not >>>> involve another unnecessary iteration as there is umit.pm.gui. Would >>>> umit.pm.gui.bt_sniffer work then as the bt_sniffer interface leverages PM's >>>> interface? >>>> >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Devtar >>> >> >> >> Best Regards, >> -- >> Luís A. Bastião Silva >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Umit-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/umit-devel
