Nagilum escribió: > It makes sense to at least include .NET 1.1 and 2.0, which are currently > most used. > .NET 3.x seems not to be used very often atm. But that'll change... >
Including 1.1 and 2.0 was the default up to now. I have started wondering about it when the SP3 was out. I am happy either way.. but I think that if you do not include java, adobe reader and flash then you should not include dotnet. Only if you needed it, call dotnet.bat on you scripts. maybe we can split up like dotnet1.bat dotnet2.bat and dotnet3.bat What do you think? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ unattended-devel mailing list unattended-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-devel
