On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:47:12AM +0200, Jens Geile wrote: > I for one wouldnt bother upgrading to a new version of unattended without the > search-win-drivers stuff as this is one major feature > i'm really interested in. Just a new kernel or updated install scripts isnt > really worth the time you have to put into testing a new > version before deploying it into a productive environment. IMHO. So I'd skip > the "cvs -> new version" release and go straight for the > "cvs + search-win-drivers -> new version" release.
Until the format of the script files change, you shouldn't have to upgrade. I'm hoping this thread starts the discussion about what set of features the active contributers want to call the next version. Then when those features are met, call it a new version. Allan. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco. 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p _______________________________________________ unattended-devel mailing list unattended-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-devel
