Pierre Bourgin escribió:
> 
> indicates that Vista has a new driver model (shared with windows 7), 
> that is not the same than 2000/XP.
> ... and vista can support 2000/XP drivers...
> 
> So I don't know what people want:

> 1- keep a separate "database" of drivers: divided between XP and Vista

I like <unattended>/install/WDM and unattended>/install/WDF

> 2- have a unified "database" of drivers (that is currently the model of 
> DriverPacks.net for instance).
> 

The links state quite the opposite:

http://downloads.driverpacks.net/vista/x86/

we should not forget about the 32bits and 64bits stuff


> Anyway, we can provides the root folder of drivers as configuration 
> option from command-line and site/config.pl via variable 
> $u->{'_temp'}->{'scan_windrivers_path'} in my example.
> 
> .. so we could also calculate a default value depending on the OS flavor 
> to install ?
> 
> and let people decide how they want to organize their windows drivers ?
> 

I know that this is a constrain, but you wuold get beneficts for it.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge  
This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, 
vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have
the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize  
details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge
_______________________________________________
unattended-devel mailing list
unattended-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-devel

Reply via email to