Hi Brad! > > This depends only on your server. If it is capable to serve 50 > > simultaneous, Unattended will do. If you use an old pentium > > server,you will have trouble to serve more than one clients at > > a time. > > I don't really think it matters how fast your machine is this case. > Unattended does not do multicast, so installing 50 machines > simultaneously is not a good idea.
I think you are wrong: Unattended does nothing. It depends on Samba (in case of a UNIX/Linux Server) or the builtin fileshare functions (in case of a windows server). Unattended only performs the initial magic on the target pc; the transfer of the os installation media (files) is done by Samba or WindowsServer. And both Samba and Windows Server DEFINITELY scale with their hardware. cu Niels -- A: Weil es die Lesbarkeit des Textes verschlechtert. F: Warum ist TOFU so schlimm? A: TOFU F: Was ist eins der groesste Aergernisse in E-Mails? ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl _______________________________________________ unattended-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-info
