On 4/7/05 7:51 AM, "Niels S. Richthof" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> screw your environment all to h***. >> I may have come across harsh, which I don't mean to, just direct. I >> think you have done some good work here. I just don't agree with some >> of your statements because they go contrary to facts that I know. > > If you do not like our system, please do not use it. > > Thank you and have a nice day. > > cu > Niels
I think you might be misunderstanding the OP. He is simply taking exception to some of the assertions that are made by the unattended project page about disk imaging and re-packaging. I personally am interested in this topic and would not want to shoo Evan away for simply bringing up some points. Unfortunately Evan (OP) adds little to the discussion in terms of giving suggestions when imaging might be a good idea or under what circumstances "Software Repackaging" might be a good idea. The only argument he has given to us is to trust his "experience" on the matter. So, what say you Evan? Can we get some more concrete examples on: Why Imaging is a good idea? or Why Software Repackaging is a good idea? I have a few software packages here at my company that I would much rather re-package with msi than use some of the AutoIT scripts that I have hacking things together. This is a good discussion. Michael ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ unattended-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-info
